Oct 11 2009

Not unto us, o LORD, not unto us

by Augustus Toplady (1740-1778)Not Unto Us, Not Unto Us

Not unto us, o LORD, not unto us, but unto Thy Name, give glory for Thy mercy, and for Thy truth’s sake (Psalm 115:1).

Some expositors have supposed, that this Psalm was penned by the prophet Daniel; on occasion of the miraculous deliverance of Shadrac, Meshac, and Abednego, when they came out, unhurt, from the burning fiery furnace, into which they had been thrown by the command of king Nebuchadnezzar.

And, indeed, there are not wanting passages, in the Psalm itself, which seem to countenance this conjecture. As where we read, at the fourth verse (speaking of the idols of the heathens, and, perhaps, with particular reference to that golden image which Nebuchadnezzar commanded to be worshipped), their idols are silver and gold, the work of men’s hands: they have mouths, but they speak not; eyes have they but they see not.

I dare say, that, in such an auditory as this, a number of Arminians are present. I fear, that all our public assemblies have too many of them. Perhaps, however, even these people, idolaters as they are, may be apt to blame, and, indeed, with justice, the absurdity of those who worship idols of silver and gold, the work of men’s hands. But let me ask: If it be so very absurd, to worship the work of other men’s hands; what must it be, to worship the works of our own hands? Perhaps, you may ask, “God forbid that I should do so.” Nevertheless, let me tell you, that trust, confidence, reliance, and dependence, for salvation, are all acts and very solemn ones too, of divine worship: and upon whatsoever you depend, whether in whole or in part, for your acceptance with God, and for your justification in His sight, whatsoever, you rely upon, and trust in, for the attainment of grace or glory; if it be any thing short of God in Christ, you are an idolater to all intents and purposes. Continue reading


Oct 4 2009

The Thirst For Glory – Introduction

“The thirst for glory is not ended by satisfying but rather by extinguishing.” Martin Luther

GloryStoryTwo theologies exist in this world; amongst a cacophony of voices there are two stories of redemption, two worldviews of life, two overarching paradigms of ontology. These antithetical theologies are locked in mortal combat, they are the Story of Glory and the Story of The Cross.

This blog is dedicated to advancing the theology of the cross; a story that bring humility, a story that brings self-despair, a story that brings hope. The Cross Story is a theology which transforms the beholder and captivates the object of it’s power! It is a story which reaches out and makes you a part of its wonderful work by crucifying you with Christ.

The Glory Story is, for all intents and purposes, the chief arch-nemesis of the Cross. It seeks its own interests, it desires acknowledgment, and boasts of its own ability. Theologians of glory might be heard praising the Cross; but never without crediting themselves for part or all of the difference in their salvation.

By God’s providence, Martin Luther was graced with enabling to articulate these axiomatic antipodes with commanding contrast, brilliant profundity and scriptural humility. In twenty-eight pointed theses, Luther sets forth the fundamental truths most key to striking a death-blow to Romanism and works-righteousness. Instead of defining the theologies themselves, he describes the theologians.

Only eight months after Luther rocked the world with 95 Theses nailed to the Castle Church in Wittenberg, he was back with these 28 more pointed statements, this time they were nailed to the coffin of Catholicism. It is truly amazing how much insight God gave this man in only eight months, how far he was brought in truth, and how God made him free from the entanglements of Rome.

Known collectively as the “Heidelberg Disputation,” and worded in a way that only Luther could word them, these twenty-eight theses are as profound as they are intriguing. If any reader is not thoughtful in reading them, they can hardly be but misunderstood. Over the next few weeks, by the mercies of God, I hope to cover the Heidelberg Disputation in sections, to briefly explain each thesis from scripture, to show the wisdom concealed in these truths, and to exalt the resurrected Christ and the Glory of His cross!

But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God. Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men. For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called: But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are: That no flesh should glory in his presence.1 Cor. 1:23-29


Aug 26 2009

God Commands His Love!

tulip_rain-761182The scripture tells us that “The LORD will command his lovingkindness” (Psalms 42:8); and again, ”The LORD commanded the blessing, even life for evermore.” (Psalms 133:3); and, ”He hath commanded his covenant for ever” (Psalms 111:9).

Surely, nothing can be more comforting to the child of God than this! To know that the very God who sovereignly works all things according to His omnipotence and who is obeyed even by wind and waves has commanded His own holy attributes to endure with lovingkindness forever and ever, to the praise of His redemptive glorious grace in Christ Jesus!

I have penned a short little poem to capture this beautiful truth. My prayer is that the Lord will use this to uplift and edify God’s remnant, elect according to Grace!

…..

Continue reading


Aug 10 2009

Would you want to be forced…

Several months ago, a friend of mine asked of me a question. The context was God’s constraining mercy & love; the question was this:

Would you want to be forced to love someone? Or would you prefer to love someone of your own choice?

Continue reading to see the answer I put forward…

Continue reading